TREATY ON THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS – by Allen Jasson

Remember this date: Friday the 22nd January 2021. It’s an important date. It’s personal. I think we should push to make it an International Public Holiday.

My father used to say “You can’t put Old Heads on Young Shoulders”, often condescendingly after I’d done something stupid; I resented that saying. But of course, there was a modicum of truth in it. Young Men, full of passion, go off to war at the direction of Old Men. They go for King and Country, they go for God, they go to defend their homes and their families, they go fight the war to end all wars, they go to make the world safe for Freedom and Democracy, they go to liberate an oppressed people and because the enemy is profoundly evil. Like all good lies, there is a modicum of truth in it, at some time or another. Nevertheless, they go, they kill and they sometimes do terrible things and they come back scarred or changed for the worse. War belongs to the bigger world, the world where all things are decided by “Our Betters”, unless of course, we are naïve enough to believe that “we” make all these decisions with our ballot card once in every four years or so. Still, we should never forget, it’s personal.

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), is a legally binding international agreement to comprehensively prohibit nuclear weapons.

It has the ultimate goal of total elimination of Nuclear Weapons.

Negotiated at a conference that took place in March 2017 the U.N. General Assembly adopted the treaty on July 7, 2017 by a vote with 122 states in favour and it was opened for signature by the U.N. Secretary General on September 20, 2017. Ratified by Honduras in late October this year, the treaty reached the requisite 50 ratifications, and hence, is set to enter into force on January 22, 2021. It’s profoundly important.

Even Old Heads can go MAD. At the very beginning of the 1960s, the era of “Peace and Love”, after the US installed Nuclear Warhead missiles in Turkey, aimed of course at Russia, their having had the audacity to experiment with a Socio-Economic alternative to Capitalism, the Soviet Union sought to counterbalance by installing their own Nuclear Warhead missiles in Cuba, which is close enough to the US coast that even American Presidents know where it is. The resulting confrontation brought the world to a chilling realisation; the very real possibility of total, global annihilation. The world was fortunate to have the last sane President at the helm of the Empire. It cost him his life, naturally, but he came to a realisation that the world needed a more rational means of conflict resolution than violent, mutual murder and destruction.

Amid the froth of hippie sex, drugs and rock and roll a good many people around the world were now mindful of the very real and persistent possibility of Mutually Assured Destruction; complete erasure of Humanity and most other life from Planet Earth. Nevertheless, there are still nutters of the Doctor Strangelove mind-set who remain committed to the Ultimate MAD Deterrent. So it’s Us and Them and our only hope is to remain mindful that We are Many, They are Few. They are Psychopaths; people who can inflict Pain, Suffering, Injury, even Death without Empathy, Compassion or Remorse. This is the inescapable Bottom Line, the ugly truth.

To consider the way that some of these people think of this problem we need to look seriously at some of their reactions to the Treaty. In 2017 during the ongoing negotiations of the treaty, a dozen allied ambassadors stood gathered around U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley in the corridors of the U.N. building in New York, protesting against it. No brownie points for guessing who these ambassadors might represent. For decades the Nuclear Armed States have maintained an exclusive club, deciding who should be admitted and who should not, bullying non-members with the threat of Nuclear Attack ultimately to assert dominance over the world’s most critical and most wastefully abused resources and assuaging public concern with the hollow words of a string of disarmament Treaties. Most ridiculous among them being the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT); all of its provisions being as optional as corporation tax, even secretly admitting non-parties to the treaty as new members of the club (The Jewish State of Israel).

As we might expect, as the treaty negotiations were in progress all nine of the Nuclear Armed States, the U.S., Russia, the United Kingdom, China, France, India, Pakistan, North Korea (and of course, Israel) boycotted the UN negotiations and the July 2017 vote. A joint statement was issued by the United States, France and the United Kingdom declaring they “do not intend to sign, ratify or ever become party to it” and a similar statement was issued shortly afterwards on behalf of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. Unsurprisingly, Christopher Ford, Assistant Secretary of State for the only state that has ever actually used Nuclear Weapons, called the initiative “obviously a misguided and counterproductive one” and “a colossal mistake”, and later “emptily divisive virtue-signaling”. In a Nuclear Posture Review the Trump Administration labelled it “unrealistic”.

With the ratification by Honduras this year and imminent coming into force next January the club is clearly taken aback. The threat of stigmatization of the nuclear- armed states and their allies by the signatories of the treaty and global and local nongovernmental organizations has become a matter of concern. As is always the case with politicians and their masters in such a situation, like Octavius after the Assassination of Caesar, they want to present a less hostile attitude and so there is a softening of the rhetoric. Never forget; they come to bury the treaty, not to praise it.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg even said that “at first sight [the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons] seems attractive” (after which he criticized it).

As the Trump era has driven a Pick-Up Truck through the already fragile provisions to maintain what international peace we have and the coming Biden era promises only a meagre cherry-picking of provisions to restore for what political kudos might be garnered we can be sure that the Armageddon Clock, now measured in seconds, will not be drifting away from Midnight. We face, though many of us fail to see it, a very real existential threat. As we all attend to our own little lives, up here building our treehouses, they are out there among our trees, an insane mob, with their chainsaws.

This is a time and a cause worthy of the global common, a cause for which we should seek the very first truly significant measure of International Solidarity among ordinary Men and Women of ALL Colours and Creeds, a show of strength to face down the psychopaths; an International Public Holiday on the 22nd January marking the coming into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

4 Comments

  1. David Hampson says:

    The system what ever the system is. Will defend its own narrative. By destroying your reputations. It will send the police around the communities you called home. They will build a narrative to crush you. Acting Police Sargent Lee parry showed me how they destroyed my reputation. Because I dared to challenge the status quo with my version of Northern Ireland and the cold war. Sorry to suppress spirits. They can name and shame you as anything they desire. Consequently I believe you have chosen the right timing for your campaign. Count me in.

  2. David Westgate says:

    An excellent review and reminder of the significance of the coming coming into law of the new treaty.
    This should be a moment of change for which we can be a little more hopeful with the change in Washington. However of course, that can’t be relied upon. We still need to put pressure on our own government to see sense, especially at a time when we need to spend on much more rationally identifiable problems.

  3. David Marchesi says:

    The UK is well-placed to take a constructive role in promoting peace instead of war, common sense instead of bluster. After all, the voters have asked for Independence, and this means- of course- independence from the US as well as from the EU. Our mission can best be pursued through the UN, however imperfect it may be. We should encourage people like Tobias Ellwood in opposition to Mr Johnson’s childish bluster , and see that the maniacs of the Daily Mail [etc] are hushed . Almost daily, some nitwit “leader” ,politician or pundit seems to blather on about how tough he is ,rejecting this treaty out-of-hand and laughing at such initiatives as a Ministry of Peace. I recall George McGovern, WW2 veteran and the last really honourable person to stand for POTUS, remarking that he was “fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in”. Nuclear war, as we know, means killing of the innocents on an industrial scale,the opposite of courage.

  4. Patrick Bealey says:

    Friends,
    This is a very timely reminder. We’ve had a lot to think about in 2020. Now is the time to be reminded of priorities. Existential for the Earth is not an exaggeration, when it comes to nuclear weapons. And now such weapons are down to bullet-size the dangers are not getting less, are they?
    Bless you for your vigilance,
    Patrick

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s