REPORT: VFP SOUTH EAST 19/02/2018

Summary: VFP South East weekly activity and social.

Date of activity: 19/02/2018

Location of activity: London

Main text: On Monday 19th Feb, members of VFP South East deployed to Waterloo Station, London to hand out flyers Neutral Country cards. Two teams covered both major entrances and handed out over 200 cards during the busy rush hour period.

Social: Members went to a local pub for a debrief on the action and general catch up.

VFP Attendance: 5
Guest Attendance: 1

Keep an eye on the events page for details of next weeks action https://vfpuk.org///events/

Name of author: Wayne Sharrocks

Email of author: southeast@vfpuk.org

 

REPORT: VFP SOUTH EAST MONTHLY MEETING

Summary: Great attendance at this months meeting.

Date of activity: 12/02/2018

Location of activity: London

Main text: On Monday 12th Feb, members of VFP packed out the Housemans bookshop meeting room leaving standing room only for the second monthly meeting of 2018.

At the meeting we covered the following agenda:
• Statement of Purpose
• Names of attendees and branch of service
• Welcome to new members
• Recent activity
• Neutral Country
• Upcoming activity
• Whip round for room hire cost (£20)

Social: After the meeting members went to the Millers pub located just 2 minutes walk from Housmans bookshop. An uplifting turnout with a real sense of a community building.

VFP Attendance: 19
Guest Attendance: 2

Keep an eye on the events page for details of next weeks action https://vfpuk.org///events/

Name of author: Wayne Sharrocks

Email of author: southeast@vfpuk.org

UPCOMING ACTIVITY: VFP UK SUMMER CAMP

Purpose of activity: Annual Summer Camp for members and their families.

Starts: Friday 24 August at 1500

Location: Lynsters Farm, Old Uxbridge Road, West Hyde, Herts, WD3 9XJ

Finishes: Sunday 26 August at 1800

This will be the third year we have run a summer camp.

The previous camps have been great.

Free food, drink & live music provided. Bring your family, large play area for children.

There are a limited number of tents available, but it would be advisable to bring your own.

Please fill out the form to register.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Do you need a tent?

REPORT: VFP NORTH EAST 10/2/2018

Summary: VFP NE Monthly meeting.

Date of activity: 10/02/2018

Location of activity: York.

Main text: Members of VFP North East met to discuss future monthly actions in the area. Topics covered included the need to look for upcoming local activities and pass the information to the regional coordinator, in order that targeted action can be planned. It was a pleasure to welcome two new members to the group.

Name of author: Norman Lynch

Email of author: northeast@vfpuk.org

REPORT: VFP SOUTH EAST 05/02/2018

Summary: VFP South East weekly activity and social.

Date of activity: 05/02/2018

Location of activity: London

Action: On Monday 5th Feb, members of VFP South East deployed in central London to conduct silent bannering outside the Ministry of Defence headquarters. The banner displayed the message “War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century” and was on display to anyone leaving the building.

As a result of our presence the Police / MoD Security decided to shut the main doors.

Social:  Members went to a local Wetherspoons for a debrief on the action and general catch up.

VFP Attendance: 6
Guest Attendance: 1

Keep an eye on the events page for details of next weeks action https://vfpuk.org///events/

Name of author: Wayne Sharrocks

Email of author: southeast@vfpuk.org

REPORT: VFP SOUTH WEST 01/02/2018

Summary: VFP SW attend “Syria, Lies and Videotape”

Date of activity: 01/02/2018

Location of activity: Frome

Main text: Members of VFP South West attended an event put on by Frome Stop War. The journalist Eva Bartlett gave her take on the recent history of the war in Syria.  There was also a guest appearance by Vanessa Beeley.

Keep an eye on the VFP UK events calendar for future activity in the South West.

Name of author: Nev Dean

Email of author: southwest@vfpuk.org

REPORT: VFP SOUTH EAST 29/01/2018

Summary: VFP South East weekly activity and social.

Date of activity: 29/01/2018

Location of activity: London

Action: On Monday 29th Jan, members of VFP South East deployed in central London to hand out flyers. This week we tested out different locations (tube entrances, busy streets and train station entrances) to learn more about where works best. We also tried different techniques of handing out flyers from highly vocal to passive to learn more about what style of approach works best for different audiences.

Members managed to have some indepth conversations with the public about the Neutral Country campaign with some positive responses.

Social: Another great attendance. VFP SE member Danny Beever celebrated his birthday with some quality home made muffins made by new member Bat-hen. David Gee the academic writer responsible for the brilliantly written and well researched “First ambush” report also came along for a catch up.

VFP Attendance: 5
Guest Attendance: 2

Keep an eye on the events page for details of next weeks action https://vfpuk.org///events/

Name of author: Wayne Sharrocks

Email of author: southeast@vfpuk.org

REPORT: VFP SOUTH EAST WEEKLY ACTIVITY

VFP South East are now conducting weekly meet ups/actions on Monday nights.

These are separate to the more formal monthly meetings held on the second Monday of every month in Housmans Bookshop. They serve to increase the productivity of our regional group through small weekly actions as well as increase a sense of community and group cohesion within VFP South East.

When I took the role of South East Coordinator I saw a need to bridge the long gap between the formal monthly meetings. Members work schedules within VFP South East are all different meaning some people can’t attend every monthly meeting. This could mean not seeing another member of VFP for months at a time and feeling “out of the loop”. After discussion with several members there was keen interest in more regular meet ups.

The aim of each meeting is to start with an action of at least 1 hour. This could be as simple as flyering in a busy area. This is then followed by an informal social event after the action has finished.

Over the last month we have had a lesson from member Dan Taylor on flyering then used the skills learnt to handout Neutral Country campaign cards outside London Bridge station and attended a talk from Reprieve on Drones & Assassinations organised by David Collins and Cafe Diplo.

We have more exiting and informative events coming up including; street speaking, guided tours and film nights to name a few.

We hope to see you there.

Wayne Sharrocks

southeast@vfpuk.org

DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEUTRAL COUNTRY CAMPAIGN

At our AGM we voted to develop a campaign for the United Kingdom to become a permanently neutral country.

The campaign is now in development with the aim of launching nationally in November 2018.

Information can be found on the Neutral Country website, greater detail will be published over the coming months.

 

VFP UK HANDBOOK 2018

The Veterans For Peace UK Handbook is our governing document. Amendments can only be made at our AGM.

Click the link for a PDF copy of the VFP UK Handbook 2018.

https://vfpuk.org///handbook-2018/

A printed pocket book version will be available in 2018.

CENOTAPH 2017

Remembrance Sunday 12 November
1300hrs
Meeting point: Whitehall Place
(Charing Cross / Embankment / Westminster)

Every Remembrance Sunday Veterans For Peace UK walk to The Cenotaph under the banner “NEVER AGAIN” and hold a ceremony to remember all of those killed in war including civilians and enemy soldiers. Supporters of VFP UK are invited and encouraged to follow us to The Cenotaph.

Meeting point:
Gather from 1300hrs/1pm at Whitehall Place. Nearest tube stations are Charing Cross, Embankment or Westminster.

The Walk to The Cenotaph:
Never Again banner at the front, wreath carried directly behind. Remainder in threes, bugler in the last row. VFP Banner at the rear. All supporters follow behind the VFP column.

The Ceremony:
Line up facing the Cenotaph.
Sing the song “1916”.
Read the poem “Suicide in the Trenches”.
Lay the wreath of white poppies.
Bugler to play Last Post.
Observe one minute of silence.
Bugler to play “Reveille”.

The Walk back to Whitehall Place:
VFP banner at the front, wreath carried directly behind. Remainder in threes, bugler in the last row.  Never Again banner at the rear. All supporters follow behind the VFP column.

Dress:
VFP Members: VFP UK Sweatshirt, shirt, black tie, dark trousers / skirt, dark Shoes.
Followers: Dressed for a funeral.

Equipment:
Never Again Banner carried at the front.
Wreath of White Poppies.
Megaphone.
VFP UK Banner, carried at the rear.
No other banners, placards or megaphones allowed.

All those attending agree to conform to the VFP UK Statement of Conduct.

Bag Drop:
Secure bag drop available from 12 Midday at The Marquis Pub (51-52 Chandos Pl, WC2N 4HS)

Facebook event:
https://www.facebook.com/events/174939556405385/

BACKDROP TO THE PUTNEY DEBATES OF 1647

Veterans For Peace (VFP) – a voluntary organisation of men and women, who collectively have served in every war that Britain has fought since WW2 – are organising to commemorate on Saturday 28 October 2017, the Putney Debates of 370 years ago.

The Putney Debates of 1647 occurred during the English Civil War and were essentially about democracy, both in the country and for its armed forces. They took place between the Senior Officers, or Grandees, of the New Model Army and the Agitators, who were the elected representatives of the rank-and-file soldiers.

The debates took place at St Mary’s Church in the midst of two great upheavals. The Reformation had seen the long hold of the Catholic Church being supplanted by Protestantism. And Feudalism, the old ruling system, was breaking down and Parliament, aided by sections of the people, challenged the ‘divine right’ of the King, which led to the Civil War.

Yet, despite all this chaos, at Putney rank-and-file Agitators argued in support of many far-seeing democratic demands, some of which have still not been conceded today.

The Reformation

In medieval Europe the dominant social system was feudalism, in which the nobility held lands from the crown in exchange for military service. While the vast majority of the population, as serfs or peasants, were forced to live on their lord’s lands to labour for, and pay homage to, their rulers.

In many countries the Catholic Church had become a principal feudal force, forming a rich and corrupt part of the state apparatus. The ‘will of God,’ which governed many aspects of people’s lives, was passed down through popes, monarchs and an apparatus of church placemen. Very often their interpretation of God’s will was that the poor should ‘accept their lot’ and ‘obey their betters.’

From 1517 the Protestant Reformation had swept through Europe as feudalism was on the wane and bourgeois capitalism was emerging.

The idea, implicit in the new religion, that an individual could have a direct relationship with God and interpret the divine will for themselves, was a revolutionary one – which threatened for a time to ‘turn the world upside down.’

In England, a more modest Protestantism gradually became established after King Henry VIII, who had his own reasons for rejecting the Papacy, turned his back on Rome and in 1534 made himself head of the Church of England. But Henry, fearful of the radicalism the new religion had exhibited elsewhere, ensured that the new moderate Anglican Church became an integral arm of the Tudor state.

Mary Tudor threatened to reinstate the Catholic Church during her brief reign, but Protestantism was consolidated under Elizabeth I. As the new religion became dominant in England many ‘martyrs’ were created in bitter struggles for and against it. Patriotism was whipped up to combat ‘Popish plots’ and supporting Protestantism became synonymous with national security and the need for a strong state.

Contesting the Aristocracy

The centralised state that grew under the reign of the Tudors had helped English trade and expansionism to develop. With the merchant centre, London, as the capital, the entrepreneurs and financiers who stood behind this growing commerce gradually increased in power and influence. It was largely this new merchant class that forced Queen Elizabeth I to use her navy to help check Spain’s competing overseas enterprises.

While Elizabeth had been successful in balancing the various ruling interests and factions during her reign, differences continued to intensify as various sections of society gradually contested the dominance of the old feudal monarchy, aristocracy and church. And in 1640 a civil war started in England when the growing capitalist forces, allied with Parliament and some prominent Protestants, challenged the absolute power of Charles I and his nobles.

Oliver Cromwell, a minor landed gentleman, rose to prominence in the fight against the king by bringing organisation, discipline and training to the Parliamentary military forces. His victorious New Model Army was composed mainly of disciplined and determined Puritans, who would often sing psalms as they marched into battle.

A ‘Soldier’s Catechism’ was produced in 1644 for the New Model Army soldiers that fought against the king. It was ‘Written for the Encouragement and Instruction of all that have taken up Arms in this Cause of God and his People; especially the common Soldiers.’ Like most texts of the period it was couched mainly in strident theological terms, but it was written to inspire a citizen army – albeit one motivated by a Protestant religious zeal.

Levellers & Diggers

Cromwell and his backers needed to mobilise the maximum support to defeat the Royalists and the New Model Army contained within its ranks many soldiers from the lower orders, who pursued objectives that were a great deal more radical than those sought by Cromwell, or the other Grandees.

The Levellers, who believed in the free interpretation of the scriptures and who opposed establishment control of the church, were political – as well as religious – radicals. They opposed primogeniture and great estates and got their name from levelling fences and hedges, which enclosed former common land. They demanded that:

‘All grounds which anciently lay in common for the poor, [and are now enclosed], be laid open again to the free and common use and benefit of the poor.’

The Levellers advocated free schools and hospitals for all as well as a more equal society:

‘Round about 1646, towards the end of the first Civil War, the Levellers emerged as an independent group. There had been peasant revolts in the past. The first claim of the Levellers to originality lay in this, that they organised as a modern party, run on democratic lines, a third force, drawn from the lower middle class, the skilled craftsmen and the small farmers. Their followers ranged from some well-to-do merchants to the weavers of Spitalfields and the lead-miners of Derbyshire…. The Levellers were the first political party that dared to make complete religious toleration a chief plank in their platform. By 1647 they had behind them most of the rank and file of the New Model Army and many of its junior officers.’ [From The Levellers and the English Revolution, by H. N. Brailsford, Spokesman Books 1976.]

The Diggers, or ‘True Levellers,’ who got their name from their attempts to dig-up and plant crops on enclosed land, considered Charles I to be the ‘Norman Successor’ and with his execution that the ‘Norman Yoke’ had at last been cast off.

Gerrard Winstanley, a leader of the Diggers, declared that:

‘In the beginning of Time, the great Creator Reason made the Earth to be a Common Treasury … but not one word was spoken in the beginning that one branch of mankind should rule over another.’ 

Winstanley, an early environmentalist who also attempted to organise the rural poor, left these words for those who would come after:

‘When these clay bodies are in grave
and children stand in place,
This shows we stood for truth
and peace and freedom in our days.’

Women’s Rights

Under feudalism, poor women were the serfs of serfs and had no rights, with their lives dependant on their husband’s goodwill. During the Civil War some women became active in the new religious sects and a few became preachers. Many women started to question the lack of education for females and discussed issues like polygamy and divorce.

It was also a time, however, when fear and superstition, which were constant factors under the feudal system, still abounded. And Matthew Hopkins was conducting his witch-hunts, which led to the brutal deaths of over 300 women. Despite this, the Civil War, which brought forward groups like the Levellers and Diggers also saw an upsurge in women seeking their rights, including equality in family life.

Leveller women organised many protests and petitions addressed to parliament, calling for peace, an end to high taxes and the debt laws – and demanded Leveller leaders be released. One of their petitions asked a simple question:

‘Have we not an equal interest with the men of this Nation, in those liberties and securities contained in the Petition of Right, and the other good laws of the land?’

The women were often met by armed force, or trampled by horses – and some were locked away in brutal jails. They were lampooned as ‘oyster wenches’ and ‘fishwives’ – and Parliament told them to go home and ‘meddle’ with their ‘huswifery.’

Nevertheless, many women persevered, and one report claimed that ‘sometimes 5,000 women were swarming around Parliament.’ And an MP complained that:

‘A multitude of women … came to the very doore of the House and there cryed … “Peace, Peace,” and interrupted divers of the members both as they went in and as they came out of the House and threatened violence to those members who were enemies of peace.’

 The Agitators

There had been no permanent army in England before the Civil War, because in the past the ruling King or Queen had raised armies to fight specific wars – after which these forces were then disbanded. The origins of the modern British Army of today can be traced back to the Civil War and Cromwell’s New Model Army, as a professional standing army, funded and controlled by Parliament, gradually emerged from this period.

In the New Model Army the Levellers sought to bring an element of democracy to the military and give lower ranking soldiers a voice. To this end they organised to elect soldier representatives, called Agitators, who put forward the rank and file’s point of view:

‘We were not a mere mercenary army, hired to serve any arbitrary power of a state, but called forth and conjured by the several declarations of Parliament to the defence of our own and the people’s just rights and liberties. And so we took up arms in judgment and conscience to those ends.’ [From Representation, a Leveller document addressed to Parliament.]

Then ‘agitator’ meant ‘representative,’ the modern negative connotation of the word comes from the establishments fear and distaste for this early example of rank and file power. Two agitators were elected from each regiment and they, with two officers from the same unit, met and debated at Putney with the senior officers (Grandees) on the Army Council.

The arguments of both sides were often enunciated in fairly archaic biblical terms. It was clear, however, that while Cromwell and the other Grandees advocated the preservation of property rights and for the rich to retain their privileges and power, the Agitators stood not only for the rights of ordinary soldiers, but also, with the Levellers, for those of the common people.

The Agitators were citizen soldiers who had reluctantly fought against the King, because he would not concede an inch of democracy. They were part of a Leveller movement who stood for the separation of church from state and for toleration and liberty of conscience among the people – including soldiers in the army. When women spoke up for their rights the Levellers included in their aims greater equality between men and women – that was to be enacted in law.

Many of these demands were contained in the ‘An Agreement of the People’ document, which was drafted in 1647 after discussions between the Levellers and Agitators. They believed that some of the Grandees they’d fought under now wanted to consolidate a new power structure, which would also be undemocratic and retain much of the old status quo.

The ‘An Agreement of the People’ document started by saying it was for: ‘a firm and present peace upon the grounds of common right …’ It also stated that Parliament should be elected biennially and consist of a single elected house.

Later versions of the Levellers’ document called for:

  • A drastic extension of the right to vote.
  • Annual elections, with MPs serving one term only.
  • Debarring officers and lawyers from being MPs [to avoid any conflict of interests].
  • Equality of all before the law, with jury trials.
  • Abolition of military conscription, monopolies and excise taxes.

MPs were to be elected in proportion to the population of their constituencies. Parliament should not interfere with freedom of religion. It should not press men to serve in the armed forces. It should not exempt anyone from the ordinary course of the law and all laws passed must be for the common good.

Postscript

In the end the Levellers, Diggers, militant women and the Agitators were gradually supressed. But executions, imprisonment and state repression could not kill their ideas of rights for all and a more democratic country and armed forces. Over later centuries these ideals were raised up again and again and – with their vision of ‘a firm and present peace upon the grounds of common right …’ – are still alive in our own day.

PUTNEY DEBATES 2017

Dissent and Debate in the Armed Forces

Saturday 28 October 2017
1200-1600

St Mary’s Church
High Street Putney
London
SW15 1SN

This October Veterans For Peace UK will be hosting the first of a series of debates on the concept of democracy, debate and dissent in the Armed Forces and the impact on our society and history.

Keynote speakers include historians John Rees, author of the new biography on John Lilburne, and Julian Putowski, author of ‘Shot at Dawn’. The headline event will be a debate with modern day dissenters – former SAS soldier Ben Griffin, and former submariner Mike Lyons.

In each session audience feedback, questions, and debate will be encouraged.

At the end of the first English Civil War soldiers, civilians, and men of power came together to debate the future of England and their place in it. The debates started on 28th October 1647 at St Mary’s Church in Putney. Some of their ideas on democracy, representation, and land rights have still not been achieved, such as the abolition of the House of Lords. This was the beginning of the discussion about democracy and the rights of people in a modern society.

This is the first time in 370 years that veterans have come together to commemorate this event and discuss the big issues of the day.

For further information please email: 1647@vfpuk.org

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/putney-debates-2017-dissent-and-debate-in-the-armed-forces-tickets-37979182758

Earlier this year five members of VFP attended the Levellers Day event in Burford on Saturday 20 May 2017.

Levellers Day commemorates three soldiers who were executed on Oliver Cromwell’s orders in Burford churchyard, Oxfordshire, on 17 May 1649. They had refused to fight in Ireland and belonged to a movement popularly known as the Levellers, with beliefs in civil rights and religious tolerance. A report and short film of this event can be seen at: https://vfpuk.org///2017/levellers-day-2017/

INTERNATIONAL PEACE DAY

Thursday 21 September 2017
By Genny Bove

Report from a vigil for peace in Wellington, Telford called by 94 year old war veteran George Evans.  

For 25 years war veteran George Evans was invited to read the memorial poem at the annual Remembrance Day event organised by the Royal British Legion in the small Shropshire town of Wellington where he has lived all his life. However, in 2014 he inadvertently offended the organisers by reading one of his own poems ‘The Lesson’ in which he remembered the dead on both sides of WWII. The following year, the Legion ‘disinvited’ him after George refused to accept a virtual gag that would have obliged him to stick to a pre-agreed ‘script’ for the ceremony.

Two years on and still firmly committed to peace action at the age of 94, George decided to hold an hour long vigil in Wellington to mark the United Nations International Day of Peace on 21 September, inviting others to do the same. He is planning a further peace vigil in Wellington for Remembrance Sunday.

As I happened to be passing the town on my way back to Wales from London, I broke my journey to join George and a dozen others this lunchtime. We stood – or in George’s case sat – in the beautiful town centre Peace Garden that George was instrumental in creating opposite the Civic Centre, our presence delivering a visual message for peace to residents, politicians and the world on this international peace day.

George explained to me later that it had simply not occurred to him that anyone would find his poem for Remembrance Sunday offensive. He said that Harry Patch’s words: ‘War is organised murder and nothing else’ had inspired the piece and was pleased to hear that Veterans for Peace UK have Harry Patch’s quote printed on the back of their hoodies and t-shirts. George’s poem reads:

I remember my friends and enemies too.
We all did our duty for our countries.
We all obeyed our orders, then we murdered each other.
Isn’t war stupid?

George experienced at first hand the brutal reality of armed conflict. He took part in the Normandy landings and was present at the liberation of Belsen. As one of the few surviving veterans of WWII, he is surely qualified and entitled to express an opinion about the futility of war and to comment on the fact that young lives were wasted on both sides. By attempting to silence him with the bizarre argument that the Remembrance Sunday parade is not the time for peace messages, the Royal British Legion has – to use a military metaphor – shot itself in the foot. George, meanwhile, bears the organisation no ill will and uses every opportunity to speak out for peace. Long may he continue.

To join Veterans For Peace UK please click HERE

PUTNEY DEBATES 2017

Dissent and Debate in the Armed Forces

Saturday 28 October 2017
1200-1600

St Mary’s Church
High Street Putney
London
SW15 1SN

This October VFP UK will be hosting the first of a series of debates on the concept of democracy, debate and dissent in the Armed Forces and the impact on our society and history.

Keynote speakers include historians John Rees, author the new biography on John Lilburne, and Julian Putowski, author of ‘Shot at Dawn’. The headline of the event will be a debate with modern day dissenters former SAS soldier Ben Griffin, and former submariner Mike Lyons.

In each session audience feedback, questions, and debate will be encouraged. At the end of the first English Civil War soldiers, civilians, and men of power came together to debate the future of England and their place in it. The debates started on 28th October 1647 at St Mary’s Church in Putney. Some of their ideas on democracy, representation, and land rights have still not been achieved, such as the abolition of the House of Lords. This was the beginning of the discussion about democracy and the rights of people in a modern society.

This is the first time in 370 years that veterans have come together to commemorate this event and discuss the big issues of the day.

For further information please email 1647@vfpuk.org

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/putney-debates-2017-dissent-and-debate-in-the-armed-forces-tickets-37979182758

BOOK REVIEW: HIT AND RUN

A review of the book “Hit and Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the Meaning of Honour” authored by Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson (ISBN 9780947503390)

“What is it that we don’t understand? We’re going to lose this fucking war if we don’t stop killing civilians”: General Stanley McChrystal’s outburst at his morning staff briefing in the summer of 2009 reflected his concern about the steady trickle of Afghan civilian deaths from operations conducted by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). He wrote that the “instinctive way we reacted to alleged incidents made it worse”.  Investigations and apologies meant little if the incidents continued as they did. As a group of Afghan elders told one of his fact-finding teams: “Afghans hear with their eyes, not just with their ears.” In essence, it is not what you say, but what you do – which is the story of Nicky Hager’s and Jon Stephenson’s Hit and Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the Meaning of Honour.

I went out and bought a copy of Hit and Run as soon as it was published. I already had Hager’s Other People’s Wars, which is a fascinating read. Not so much for his agenda, which was obvious, but for his detailed research and his ability to get people to talk to him – great ferreting skills. He produced a book whose detail and footnotes will be an essential tool for whoever writes the history of New Zealand’s commitment to Afghanistan.

New Zealand committed the New Zealand Special Air Service (NZSAS) in 2001 to assist the United States Forces in Afghanistan in the hunt for the Al-Qaeda leadership. It followed up with the deployment of the New Zealand Provincial Reconstruction Team (NZPRT) in 2003, which, as the name implies, was geared to assist Afghan recovery. It was deployed to Bamyan Province, a pro-government area. It was a very astute choice of ground by the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) reconnaissance team. In 2010, New Zealand had been in the country for nine years, and Bamyan was no longer as benign as it had been. McCrystal had gone, but General Petraeus continued his counterinsurgency policy. A New Zealand PRT patrol was ambushed, and the patrol commander, Lieutenant Tim O’Donnell, was killed. He was the first New Zealand combat death in Afghanistan. It is this ambush and its consequences that is the story of Hit and Run.

After the ambush, the NZPRT “did everything it could to reduce the target profile of our people operating up the Shakera Valley and into the north-east of Bamyan Province.” Under normal circumstances, it would have few other options, but the presence of the NZSAS in Kabul presented a strike option to ensure that the insurgent group were taught a lesson, so they would think twice before doing it again.

The NZSAS, who won high praise on their previous deployments from 2001-2005, were based in Kabul, where they were involved in counterinsurgency operations with the Police Afghan Crisis Response Unit (CRU) with whom they had a mentoring role. New Zealand asked for the NZSAS component to be used against the insurgent leadership, who had conducted the ambush. They, together with the Afghan CRU, were made available for Operation BURNHAM – a New Zealand-directed SAS/CRU operation against villages in the Tirgiran Valley in the neighbouring province of Baghlan, which intelligence indicated was the location of the group that had ambushed the New Zealand PRT patrol.

Hit and Run pieces together the evolving intelligence picture and planning for this New Zealand operation. It is a jigsaw puzzle of accounts and interviews that shows how the key insurgents were identified and tracked to their home villages in the Tirgiran Valley. It differed from previous NZSAS operations in that this had a totally New Zealand focus. By chance, both the New Zealand Chief of Defence Force, Lieutenant-General Mataparae, and Wayne Mapp, the Minister of Defence, were in Afghanistan and were involved in the pre-operational briefings. Final confirmation to proceed with the operation involved a phone call to John Key, the prime minister. Despite the presence of the Afghan CRU and helicopter support, it was very much a New Zealand show.

The book paints a picture of an operation that goes badly off the rails. The principals were not at home, and Hit and Run asserts that 21 civilians were dead or wounded, mostly women and children, with one of the six dead being a three-year-old girl. A dozen houses were destroyed by fire or explosives.

This is where the NZDF account and that of Hager and Stephenson diverge. The initial ISAF report after the operation was one of unqualified success. One assumes it was also the tenor of the immediate briefing to the Minister of Defence and the Chief of Defence Force (CDF). ISAF Joint Command Afghanistan reported: “Numerous insurgents killed and weapons recovered” in a combined operation involving Afghan National Security Forces and coalition forces; “No civilians were injured or killed during this operation.”

This was immediately contradicted on the ground. The provincial governor of Baghlan Province, Governor Mojid, received a delegation of villagers who claimed that “a very big operation had occurred with helicopters … that some landed and the operation was firing at civilians and left.” The locals claimed that six civilians had been killed: four adult males, one adult female and one child aged six. Additionally, two adult females were being treated in a local hospital for wounds.

Hager and Stephenson go into great detail on the raid and its aftermath, and produce a list of 21 named casualties drawn from Afghan sources. The complaints prompted an ISAF investigation which concluded that a weapon-malfunction from supporting helicopters may have caused casualties, for which they apologised. There was no publicity on it being a New Zealand-led raid or of NZSAS’s involvement.

Hit and Run examines the ongoing determination to find and eliminate or capture the insurgent leadership. A further operation into the Tirgiran Valley was conducted by NZSAS on 2/3 October 2010 which targeted houses already attacked in the initial raid.

Running parallel to this was a determination to refute any suggestion that NZSAS had been involved and then, when this came out, to insist that they were not involved in any of the civilian casualties. Revelation after revelation followed, each being rejected. The standard response was to attack the veracity of the messengers, Hager and Stephenson. The gradual unravelling of the government’s and the NZDF’s position makes fascinating reading. Today, NZDF still holds firm to their original stance. The current CDF, Lieutenant- General Tim Keating, dissected the book in a briefing to journalists on 27 March 2017. He outlined the care and preparation that went into the planning and preparation for the raid and states that this was matched in its execution: “The conduct of this operation, as with the numerous other New Zealand SAS operations in Afghanistan, would be led by the best intelligence available and executed with professionalism.”

Keating’s key argument was that the locations given for the attack in the book differed from where the operation occurred by a distance of some two kilometres, so whatever happened in the two villages identified by Hager and Stephenson was not carried out by NZSAS. Keating then highlighted the degree of control exerted in the operation. The air assets supporting the raid were under the control of NZSAS who directed the aircraft fire at insurgents leaving the villages. He accepted two houses may have been inadvertently destroyed, but claimed nine insurgent deaths and regretfully that of the three-year-old child due to weapon-malfunction.

I weighed up the layers of evidence that the authors had garnered from both anonymous New Zealand servicemen and from Afghan official sources, including members of the Afghan CRU who took part in the operation, and evaluated it against Keating’s rebuttal. I asked the question, how likely is it that there were two major operations involving ISAF security forces with helicopter support in the Tirgiran Valley on the same night: very unlikely indeed. I also noted that Hit and Run spoke of further destruction to houses in a raid on 2/3 October 2010 that had previously been attacked in the first raid. Lightning striking twice in a place that, according to CDF, was never targeted. Wherever the villages are in the valley, it is obvious we are talking about one and the same location. The only operations that took place in the Tirgiran Valley that night were those conducted by NZSAS. I also asked why we should doubt Afghan reports of civilian casualties that are well documented. ISAF suggests weapon-malfunction; if so, it seems to have malfunctioned all over the place to have caused the casualties in question. The bottom line is that it was a New Zealand-led and controlled operation and that the buck stops accordingly with us.

I have an enormous respect for the New Zealand soldier and the NZSAS, but, with the best of intentions, in war things go wrong. Despite training and professional skills, the human factor clouds judgement, and people get killed. I put down Hit and Run, thinking that the accrued weight of accounts drawn by the authors across the spectrum of those involved rang true. Things went awry that night, and the soldiers knew about it – one senses that from the way they talked afterwards. None are more self-critical than soldiers, their life and those of their mates depend on such judgement. I have studied the after-action reports of the NZSAS cross-border operations in Borneo, which are remarkable for their detail and identification of what went right and wrong. I experienced similar briefings as a young platoon commander in the battalion in Singapore – when the commanding officer, a former NZSAS troop and squadron commander, went through each incident in every battalion exercise with everyone involved from the lead scout and on up the chain of command with everyone having their say – so that we could learn from it. I am sure that the same debriefing techniques are followed today. It is inconceivable that the full picture of what actually happened in the Tirgiran Valley was not known in-house in the immediate days after the raid. There is a sense of this in the whispers picked up by Hager and Stephenson.

The CDF’s briefing on Hit and Run concluded with the Director of Defence Legal Services stating that this was a “non-international armed conflict”, that is a counterinsurgency, subject to the Law of Armed Conflict. The Colonel stressed that each soldier received training in the rules of engagement and carried a Code of Conduct card that stated their individual obligations. She then stated:

It is a tragic reality that civilian casualties occur in times of armed conflict. Civilian casualties are, however, not necessarily unlawful at [sic] international law. Subsequent information, received after Operation Burnham indicated that civilian casualties may have been possible.

All this is true and indeed stated by Hager and Stephenson in their book. I read these words and thought how this compared with Lieutenant Eru Manuera’s NZSAS ambush at Mankau in Indonesian Kalimantan in 1965 where they killed the four Indonesian soldiers in the boat, but left the two civilian boatmen terrified, though unharmed. I also remember the disappointment in Lieutenant-Colonel Bob Gurr’s battalion in Borneo, when a night ambush killed an Iban trader who was leading the Indonesian raiding party. His death meant that links with the local Iban community had to be rebuilt. I then applied it to Afghanistan and wondered how General McChrystal would have reacted to this brief.

Hit and Run is an important book, which raises uncomfortable questions that needed to be asked. On the balance of probabilities, the CDF’s robust defence does not stand up to scrutiny – a New Zealand-led and controlled operation resulted in a large number of civilian casualties relative to the size of the rural hamlets involved. Our soldiers are well trained and professional, but that does not grant them infallibility – in this case, things appear to have gone badly wrong. I trust we learn from it.

Lieutenant-Colonel Christopher Pugsley is a retired infantry officer who served 22 years in the New Zealand Army and, among other books, is the author of From Emergency to Confrontation: The New Zealand Armed Forces in Malaya and Borneo 1949-1966 (2003).

SEARCH TEAM FINDS LASER WEAPON SYSTEM AT ARMS FAIR

Picture taken inside DSEi this week by our covert search team. The laser weapon is on the left.

DSEI (Defence & Security Equipment International) is the world’s largest arms fair. It allows arms buyers and sellers to network and make deals. It happens once every two years in East London.

On Thursday 7 September 2017 Veterans For Peace UK (VFP UK) conducted a vehicle check point (VCP) on the route into the Excel Centre during the setup of the DSEi Arms Fair, in order to search for banned weapons. There were reasonable grounds for suspecting that such weapons were being transported into the Excel Centre for DSEi Arms Fair. This search was obstructed by the police.

At previous arms fairs, weapons have been for sale at the fair that contravene the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (landmines, booby traps, incendiary weapons, blinding laser weapons) and the Convention on Cluster Munitions. These are conventions that the UK is a signatory of.

This week VFP deployed a covert search team into the Excel Centre to record what was being sold and promoted at the DSEi Arms Fair. Among the many stands our team found on display a prototype laser weapon system in the 50kW class, known as Dragonfire.

Although not widely known, the Royal Navy deployed laser weapons during the 1982 Falklands War. A recently declassified letter from the Secretary of State for Defence (Michael Heseltine) in January 1983 stated;

“Laser Dazzle Sight” on a Royal Navy ship is circled.

“You may recall, however, that we developed and deployed with great urgency a naval laser weapon, designed to dazzle low flying Argentine pilots attacking ships, to the Task Force in the South Atlantic. This weapon was not used in action and knowledge of it has been kept to a very restricted circle.”

The “Laser Dazzle Sight” was reportedly developed by the Royal Signals and Radar Establishment and the Admiralty Research Establishment in 1981. They were also deployed on various ships in the nineties, especially those deployed to the Gulf of Arabia. The MoD have always claimed that these were not designed to blind, but merely dazzle. However with any laser weapon it is very difficult to predict what will dazzle and what will blind.

The Dragonfire weapon is considerably more powerful than the “Laser Dazzle Sight” of the 1980’s. Will the Dragonfire weapon system contravene the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons of which the UK is a signatory? The relevant section of that convention is the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons and the answer to the question depends on:

  1. The combat function of the weapon, how the MoD intends to use the weapon.
  2. If the UK intends to transfer (sell) the weapon to another State.

Combat Function

“It is prohibited to employ laser weapons specifically designed, as their sole combat function or as one of their combat functions, to cause permanent blindness…”
(
Article 1, Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons)

The Dragonfire is currently marketed as a naval weapon to defend ships from missiles however the manufacturers claim that it can be sized up and down and so can be fitted to maritime (ships), land (tanks) and airborne platforms (planes). This greatly widens the scope of potential targets and therefore widens the scope of it’s combat function.

According to the Ministry of Defence, “Dragonfire, could complement or replace existing weapons systems with the potential for significant benefits. It could be employed to protect our maritime and land forces; for example, ships from threat missiles (not in breach) or soldiers from enemy mortars (could be in breach depending on how they intend to neutralise enemy mortars).”

We have seen with weapons such as White Phosphorous and Anti-Tank weapons that the stated combat function of a weapon is often ignored or changed in combat situations. White Phosphorous is intended to function as a smoke screen but is also used as an incendiary and to burn human targets. Anti-tank weapons are meant to be used to defend infantry from armoured vehicles but have often used to attack dismounted troops in defensive positions and even to attack homes and other civilian buildings. Whilst the Dragonfire is promoted as a defensive weapon it will be easy to deploy this weapon in an offensive role to blind enemy troops, especially in a difficult situation where UK forces are facing defeat.

Transfer to another State

The High Contracting Parties shall not transfer such weapons to any State or non-State entity.
(Article 1, Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons)

If the UK intends to transfer (sell) the weapon to another State then how that State intends to use the weapon will also determine whether the UK is in breach of the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons.

According to MBDA, one of the manufacturers, the Dragonfire project “advances the UK towards a future product with significant export potential, as well as providing opportunities for partnerships with other nations’ armed forces that have similar requirements.” So there is an intention to transfer the weapon system to other States.

The USA is a possible purchaser of Dragonfire. They have deployed a working laser weapon system on board USS Ponce in the Gulf last year. The laser has been successfully tested shooting down drone aircraft (not in breach), burning up small attacking boats (questionable), or at lower power to “dazzle” (probably in breach as using a laser to dazzle could easily cause permanent blindness).

As with any weapon there is the risk of proliferation. Once the weapon has been developed the technology can be mimicked and used, not necessarily for its originally stated combat function. There is also a risk that one of these weapons could end up in the hands of a non-state actor and be used for the purposes of terrorism by blinding civilians on a mass scale or using it to take down a civilian aircraft.

Conclusion

Energy weapons are an increasing focus for defence firms and expected to become more common on the battlefield in the next decade. Weapon systems like Dragonfire have an obvious defensive use against missiles, however they can all too easily be used to cause permanent blindness. Even if the weapon is confined to missile defence, each time a missile defence system is developed a new missile is then developed to breach it, leading to arms races and greatly adding to the cost of the defence budget.

The ban on blinding laser weapons was issued by the United Nations on 13 October 1995 and came into force on 30 July 1998. The ICRC welcomed the ban as “a significant breakthrough in international humanitarian law,” adding ”The prohibition, in advance, of the use of an abhorrent new weapon the production and proliferation of which appeared imminent is an historic step for humanity. It represents the first time since 1868, when the use of exploding bullets was banned, that a weapon of military interest has been banned before its use on the battlefield and before a stream of victims gave visible proof of its tragic effects”. The UK signed up to this ban and should behave as an example to others rather than ignoring the spirit of the ban.

As the UK / MoD cannot guarantee that Dragonfire will not be used to cause permanent blindness then the weapon is clearly in breach of the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons and should be withdrawn from the DSEi Arms Fair immediately.

Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons

Article 1

It is prohibited to employ laser weapons specifically designed, as their sole combat function or as one of their combat functions, to cause permanent blindness to unenhanced vision, that is to the naked eye or to the eye with corrective eyesight devices. The High Contracting Parties shall not transfer such weapons to any State or non-State entity.

Article 2

In the employment of laser systems, the High Contracting Parties shall take all feasible precautions to avoid the incidence of permanent blindness to unenhanced vision. Such precautions shall include training of their armed forces and other practical measures.

Article 3

Blinding as an incidental or collateral effect of the legitimate military employment of laser systems, including laser systems used against optical equipment, is not covered by the prohibition of this Protocol.

Article 4

For the purpose of this protocol “permanent blindness” means irreversible and uncorrectable loss of vision which is seriously disabling with no prospect of recovery. Serious disability is equivalent to visual acuity of less than 20/200 Snellen measured using both eyes.

MILITARY VETERANS SEARCHING FOR BANNED WEAPONS OBSTRUCTED BY POLICE

DSEI (Defence & Security Equipment International) is the world’s largest arms fair. It allows arms buyers and sellers to network and make deals. It happens once every two years in East London.

At previous arms fairs, weapons have been for sale at the fair that contravene the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (landmines, booby traps, incendiary weapons, blinding laser weapons) and the Convention on Cluster Munitions. These are conventions that the UK is a signatory of.

Yesterday (7 Sep) veterans of the armed forces conducted a vehicle check point (VCP) on the route into the Excel Centre during the set up of the DSEi Arms Fair, in order to search for banned weapons.

Two safety teams were deployed up the road to slow down traffic for the search team and the blocking team. Within minutes a large articulated lorry approached and was brought to a halt. Police officers obstructing the veterans were challenged by members of the search team to help in the task of searching for banned weapons.

David Collins a former Captain in the Royal Marines said “based on previous arms fairs there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that banned weapons are being transported into the Excel Centre today.”

Jason Lumley a former RAF Flight Lieutenant said “If the police won’t search these vehicles for banned weapons then at the very least they should not be obstructing us from carrying out that task.”

Ben Griffin a former soldier in the Parachute Regiment said “I was tasked to conduct VCPs and search for illegal weapons on hundreds of occasions in N Ireland, why are the police stopping us from doing that very same task here in East London?”

The veterans remained in position and were continuously prevented by the police from searching for banned weapons.

The actions to Stop The Arms Fair continue this weekend. Go to Stop the Arms Fair for more information.

 

VETERANS CONDUCT BANNED WEAPONS SEARCH

At previous arms fairs, weapons have been for sale that contravene the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (landmines, booby traps, incendiary weapons, blinding laser weapons) and the Convention on Cluster Munitions. Conventions that the UK is a signatory of.

There are reasonable grounds for suspecting that such weapons are being transported into the Excel Centre today.

As former members of the armed forces we are conducting a Vehicle Check Point to search vehicles entering the Excel Centre for weapons that contravene the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (landmines, booby traps, incendiary weapons, blinding laser weapons) and the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Thursday 7 September
Meet at PRINCE REGENT DLR STATION between 1030 and 1100
Coordinator:
Ben Griffin 07866 559 312
Dress:
VFP Blue Hoody / Sweatshirt / T-shirt

STOP THE ARMS FAIR

Thursday 7 September 1100 to 1600hrs
ExCel Centre
London
E16 1XL

Veterans For Peace will be taking action at the Excel Centre in East London during the set up of the DSEi Arms Fair.

Our Statement of Purpose says “we will work to end the arms race and to reduce and eventually eliminate nuclear weapons”. The DSEi Arms Fair is a key driver in the arms race.

Our Statement of Purpose says “we will work to restrain our government from intervening, overtly and covertly, in the internal affairs of other nations”. The DSEi Arms Fair provides the tools for the invasions and occupations ordered by our government.

On Thursday 7 September all members of Veterans For Peace are encouraged to attend the East Gate of the Excel Centre.

We will be carrying out citizen’s inspections of the vehicles arriving at the Arms Fair to ensure that no weapons banned under the Geneva Conventions are being brought into the fair for sale.

Meet at PRINCE REGENT DLR STATION between 1030 and 1100 on Thursday 7 September.

Coordinators:
Ben Griffin 07866 559 312

Dress: VFP Blue Hoody / Sweatshirt / T-shirt

Travel: The Underground Jubilee Line to Canning Town, change onto a Beckton-bound DLR train, to Prince Regent for ExCeL (East).

Briefing: A full briefing will be given at the VFP London meeting on Monday 4 September at 1800 in Housmans Books, Kings Cross.

 

NON-VIOLENT METHODS

Our Statement of Purpose (SoP) tells us that to achieve our goals, “members of Veterans for Peace pledge to use non-violent means”. Here is a comprehensive list of non-violent methods developed by Gene Sharp.

THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION

Formal Statements
1. Public speeches
2. Letters of opposition or support
3. Declarations by organizations and institutions
4. Signed public statements
5. Declarations of indictment and intention
6. Group or mass petitions

Communications with a Wider Audience
7. Slogans, caricatures, and symbols
8. Banners, posters, and displayed communications
9. Leaflets, pamphlets, and books
10. Newspapers and journals
11. Records, radio, and television
12. Skywriting and earth writing

Group Representations
13. Deputations
14. Mock awards
15. Group lobbying
16. Picketing
17. Mock elections

Symbolic Public Acts
18. Displays of flags and symbolic colours
19. Wearing of symbols
20. Prayer and worship
21. Delivering symbolic objects
22. Protest disrobing’s
23. Destruction of own property
24. Symbolic lights
25. Displays of portraits
26. Paint as protest
27. New signs and names
28. Symbolic sounds
29. Symbolic reclamations
30. Rude gestures

Pressures on Individuals
31. “Haunting” officials
32. Taunting officials
33. Fraternization
34. Vigils

Drama and Music
35. Humorous skits and pranks
36. Performances of plays and music
37. Singing

Processions
38. Marches
39. Parades
40. Religious processions
41. Pilgrimages
42. Motorcades

Honouring the Dead
43. Political mourning
44. Mock funerals
45. Demonstrative funerals
46. Homage at burial places

Public Assemblies
47. Assemblies of protest or support
48. Protest meetings
49. Camouflaged meetings of protest
50. Teach-ins

Withdrawal and Renunciation
51. Walk-outs
52. Silence
53. Renouncing honours
54. Turning one’s back

THE METHODS OF SOCIAL NON-COOPERATION

Ostracism of Persons
55. Social boycott
56. Selective social boycott
57. Lysistratic non-action
58. Excommunication
59. Interdict

Non-cooperation with Social Events, Customs, and Institutions
60. Suspension of social and sports activities
61. Boycott of social affairs
62. Student strike
63. Social disobedience
64. Withdrawal from social institutions

Withdrawal from the Social System
65. Stay-at-home
66. Total personal non-cooperation
67. “Flight” of workers
68. Sanctuary
69. Collective disappearance
70. Protest emigration (hijrat)

THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NON-COOPERATION: ECONOMIC BOYCOTTS

Actions by Consumers
71. Consumers’ boycott
72. Non-consumption of boycotted goods
73. Policy of austerity
74. Rent withholding
75. Refusal to rent
76. National consumers’ boycott
77. International consumers’ boycott

Action by Workers and Producers
78. Workmen’s boycott
79. Producers’ boycott

Action by Middlemen
80. Suppliers’ and handlers’ boycott

Action by Owners and Management
81. Traders’ boycott
82. Refusal to let or sell property
83. Lockout
84. Refusal of industrial assistance
85. Merchants’ “general strike”

Action by Holders of Financial Resources
86. Withdrawal of bank deposits
87. Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments
88. Refusal to pay debts or interest
89. Severance of funds and credit
90. Revenue refusal
91. Refusal of a government’s money

Action by Governments
92. Domestic embargo
93. Blacklisting of traders
94. International sellers’ embargo
95. International buyers’ embargo
96. International trade embargo

THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: THE STRIKE

Symbolic Strikes
97. Protest strike
98. Quickie walkout (lightning strike)

Agricultural Strikes
99. Peasant strike
100. Farm Workers’ strike

Strikes by Special Groups
101. Refusal of impressed labour
102. Prisoners’ strike
103. Craft strike
104. Professional strike

Ordinary Industrial Strikes
105. Establishment strike
106. Industry strike
107. Sympathetic strike

Restricted Strikes
108. Detailed Strike
109. Bumper strike
110. Slowdown strike
111. Working-to-rule strike
112. Reporting “sick” (sick-in)
113. Strike by resignation
114. Limited strike
115. Selective strike

Multi-Industry Strikes
116. Generalized strike
117. General strike

Combination of Strikes and Economic Closures
118. Hartal
119. Economic shutdown

THE METHODS OF POLITICAL NONCOOPERATION

Rejection of Authority
120. Withholding or withdrawal of allegiance
121. Refusal of public support
122. Literature and speeches advocating resistance

Citizens’ Non-cooperation with Government
123. Boycott of legislative bodies
124. Boycott of elections
125. Boycott of government employment and positions
126. Boycott of government depts., agencies, and other bodies
127. Withdrawal from government educational institutions
128. Boycott of government-supported organizations
129. Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents
130. Removal of own signs and place marks
131. Refusal to accept appointed officials
132. Refusal to dissolve existing institutions

Citizens’ Alternatives to Obedience
133. Reluctant and slow compliance
134. Non-obedience in absence of direct supervision
135. Popular non-obedience
136. Disguised disobedience
137. Refusal of an assemblage or meeting to disperse
138. Sit-down
139. Non-cooperation with conscription and deportation
140. Hiding, escape, and false identities
141. Civil disobedience of “illegitimate” laws

Action by Government Personnel
142. Selective refusal of assistance by government aides
143. Blocking of lines of command and information
144. Stalling and obstruction
145. General administrative non-cooperation
146. Judicial non-cooperation
147. Deliberate inefficiency and selective non-cooperation by enforcement agents
148. Mutiny

Domestic Governmental Action
149. Quasi-legal evasions and delays
150. Non-cooperation by constituent governmental units

International Governmental Action
151. Changes in diplomatic and other representations
152. Delay and cancellation of diplomatic events
153. Withholding of diplomatic recognition
154. Severance of diplomatic relations
155. Withdrawal from international organizations
156. Refusal of membership in international bodies
157. Expulsion from international organizations

THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT INTERVENTION

Psychological Intervention
158. Self-exposure to the elements
159. The fast
a. Fast of moral pressure
b. Hunger strike
c. Satyagrahic fast
160. Reverse trial
161. Nonviolent harassment

Physical Intervention
162. Sit-in
163. Stand-in
164. Ride-in
165. Wade-in
166. Mill-in
167. Pray-in
168. Nonviolent raids
169. Nonviolent air raids
170. Nonviolent invasion
171. Nonviolent interjection
172. Nonviolent obstruction
173. Nonviolent occupation

Social Intervention
174. Establishing new social patterns
175. Overloading of facilities
176. Stall-in
177. Speak-in
178. Guerrilla theatre
179. Alternative social institutions
180. Alternative communication system

Economic and Political Intervention
181. Reverse Strike
182. Stay-in Strike
183. Nonviolent land seizure
184. Defiance of Blockades
185. Politically Motivated Counterfeiting
186. Preclusive Purchasing
187. Seizure of assets
188. Dumping
189. Selective patronage
190. Alternative markets
191. Alternative transportation systems
192. Alternative economic institutions
193. Overloading of administrative systems
194. Disclosing identities of secret agents
195. Seeking imprisonment
196. Civil disobedience of “neutral” laws
197. Work-on without collaboration
198. Dual sovereignty and parallel government

Gene Sharp researched and catalogued these 198 methods and provided a rich selection of historical examples in his seminal work, The Politics of Nonviolent Action (3 Vols.) Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973.

STATEMENT OF CONDUCT

1. We will use our anger at injustice as a positive, nonviolent force for change.

2. We will not assault, verbally or physically, in person or online, those who oppose or disagree with us, even if they assault us.

3. Our attitude, as conveyed through our words, symbols and actions, will be one of openness, friendliness, and respect toward all people we encounter.

4. We will follow the directions of the designated coordinators during public actions.

5. We use consensus-based decision making within our groups.

6. We reject military clothing and symbols.

7. We speak as members of VFP UK but not for VFP UK, unless designated as a spokesperson.

8. Rank, unit, combat experience, age, gender, race, wealth, education, class, religion and nationality carry no status within VFP UK.

9. Sexist, racist, homophobic and other discriminatory language and actions are common within the military; they are not acceptable within VFP UK.

10. Our words and actions will maintain the political and financial independence of VFP UK.

VFP IN FORRES

Sunday 27 August
7 to 9pm

St. Leonards Church Hall,
43 High St,
Forres
IV36 1PB

Michael Elstub is speaking to the combined peace groups from the Forres-Elgin area of Scotland. The meeting is open to all. He will be covering VFP history, what actions we are currently engaged in, his own journey to peace activism and the Militarisation of our Society. All VFP members in the area are most welcome to attend and help Michael out.

VFP PRESENTS: THE INTERNATIONALISTS

MONDAY 9 OCTOBER
1900-2030HRS

HOUSMANS BOOKS
5 CALEDONIAN ROAD
KINGS CROSS

VFP Presents a Public Event in Housmans bookshop.

On a hot summer afternoon in 1928, the leaders of the world assembled in Paris to outlaw war. Within the year, the treaty signed that day, known as the Peace Pact, had been ratified by nearly every state in the world. War, for the first time in history, was illegal. But the promise of that summer day was fleeting. Within a decade, the entire world was back at war. And in the century that followed, the Peace Pact was dismissed as an act of folly and an unmistakable failure. This book argues that this understanding is inaccurate, and that the Peace Pact ushered in a sustained march toward peace that lasts to this day.

The Internationalists tells the story of the Peace Pact by placing it in the long history of international law from the seventeenth century through the present. It details the brutal world of conflict the Pact helped extinguish, and the subsequent era where tariffs took the place of tanks. Accessible and gripping, this book will change the way we view the history of the twentieth century—and how we must work together to protect the global order the internationalists fought to make possible.

Bios:

OONA A. HATHAWAY is the Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale Law School and the Director of the Center for Global Legal Challenges.

SCOTT J. SHAPIRO is the Charles F. Southmayd Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Yale Law School, Visiting Quain Professor at University College, London, and the Director of the Center for Law and Philosophy.

http://theinternationalistsbook.com/

Social afterwards in the The Millers.

TRUE COST OF WAR: SUNDERLAND AIR SHOW

The Sunderland Air Show is the largest free annual air show held in Europe. In 2016 almost a million spectators attended the three day event.

This year promises to be no different with “another spectacular show which will feature the return of the RAF Typhoon Display Team and The Red Arrows coupled with military stands, live music, fireworks and entertainment for all the family”.

Show’s like this focus on machinery and weapons whilst omitting the effects of the weapons, the destruction caused and the inevitable deaths of soldiers and civilians alike. The public is given a sugar coated, sanitised presentation of modern warfare.

Whilst the crowds watch, in awe of the courage and skill of the pilots, the same jets are being used in a war sanctioned by the UK Government. The British made Hawk and Typhoon jets on display are currently playing a major role in the Saudi Arabia’s military campaign in Yemen. Supplied with British made air-to-ground cluster munitions and flown by the British trained Saudi Air Force these jets have been used to kill thousands of civilians.

I understand the destruction that Typhoon aircraft can create, having fitted and supervised weapon load teams to install Enhanced Paveway II, laser guided 1,000lb bombs to the aircraft during Operation Ellamy, Libya, in 2011. The footage of those bombing raids would then be shown for all to see back at the base.

UK intervention in Libya has contributed to its descent into a failed state. Much like Iraq, a power vacuum has been filled with rival jihadi factions and sectarian violence. Profits are made from smuggling weapons and more strikingly, humans. Libya now has one of the most porous borders of any country and is one of the main conduits of fleeing migrants into Europe. UK foreign policy destroyed the fabric of Libya, but you won’t see that at the Sunderland Air Show.

Whilst the crowds are distracted by live music and fireworks recruitment teams from the Royal Navy, British Army and Royal Air Force will be at work.

We believe that the public deserves better than this and so we work to raise awareness of the true costs of war.

Dan Lenham served in the RAF as a Weapons Technician he is now a Veteran For Peace.


Veterans For Peace UK, is a voluntary, open and democratic ex-services organisation of men and women. Together we have fought in every war that Britain has fought since WW2. As a result of our collective experience we say that “War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century”. Our fundamental purpose is to serve the cause of world peace.

REPORT: THE FIRST AMBUSH?

The First Ambush?
Effects of army training and employment (70 pp.)

A report commissioned by Veterans For Peace UK.

This report draws on veterans’ testimony and around 200 studies from the last half-century to explore the effects of army employment on soldiers, particularly their initial training. The studies are mainly the work of military academic research departments in the UK and US, supplemented by research in other countries including Australia, Canada, Germany, and Norway.

The report finds that army employment has a forceful impact on soldiers’ attitudes, health, behaviour, and financial prospects. This is partly due to soldiers’ war experiences, but also to how they are recruited and trained, how they are conditioned by military culture, and how they re-adjust to civilian life afterwards.

Army recruitment and training

Army recruiters in the UK and US strategically target deprived neighbourhoods and children below enlistment age, presenting a sanitised picture of war, and romanticising the soldier’s role. The substantial risks, restrictions of liberty, and ethical challenges that follow enlistment are not mentioned in the marketing materials. It is British army policy to channel the youngest recruits and those from poorer backgrounds into the infantry, which uses the most coercive training methods, carries the greatest risks in war, and whose veterans face a particularly high rate of unemployment. [Refer to chapter 2 and figure 11]

To ensure that recruits will follow all orders and kill their opponents in war, army training indoctrinates unconditional obedience, stimulates aggression and antagonism, overpowers a healthy person’s inhibition to killing, and dehumanises the opponent in the recruit’s imagination. Recruits are taught that stressful situations are overcome through dominance, and that soldiers are superior to civilians. [Refer to sections 3.1-3.4]

To achieve these changes, army training isolates recruits from their civilian past, disorientates them, controls every aspect of daily life, keeps them under stress, and uses group punishments to enforce compliance and ‘weed out’ those who fall behind. Humiliation and violence are routine. According to US military officers, these methods make recruits more obedient, because ‘the intense workload and sleep restriction… leaves [recruits] little attention capacity for processing the messages they receive about new norms’.[1] [Refer to sections 3.1-3.4]

Many trainees leave or are dismissed. Around 35% of British infantry recruits are discharged during training, for example. Younger recruits from poorer backgrounds with limited education are more likely than other recruits to drop out. Those who stay tend to rate the army highly during training, but not afterwards: in 2016 job satisfaction among British trained soldiers stood at 44%. [Refer to sections 3.5-3.7]

Effects of army training and culture

The intensity of military training and culture affects soldiers even before they are sent to war. While more research is needed, the available evidence points to appreciable changes to the recruit population once they are enlisted: to personality (more antagonistic and conformist, and less emotional); to attitudes (more authoritarian and militaristic); to mental health (more anxious, depressed, and suicidal); and to behaviour (more likely to drink heavily and behave violently, including the sexual harassment of women by men). Traumatic war experiences typically reinforce these changes. [Refer to chapters 6, 7, and 8]

There appears to be no evidence to support the common assumption that military training speeds the transition to adulthood. Nor is there evidence that the military’s structured environment reduces violent behaviour, heavy drinking or substance abuse by recruits from deprived backgrounds. Research in the UK and US has found that military training and culture combine with pre-existing issues (such as a childhood history of anti-social behaviour) to increase the risk of these behaviours. Traumatic war experiences further exacerbate the problem. Violence and heavy drinking by veterans are serious public health problems. [Refer to chapters 6, 7, and 8]

Outcomes of army employment

Although the military has, in the past, functioned as a route out of poverty, research into the employment outcomes of veterans indicates that it no longer does so in the UK or US. Reduced military wages (relative to civilian pay), improvements in civilian education, and a high rate of early attrition, have devalued the army as a socioeconomic opportunity for people from poor backgrounds. While committed, career soldiers can fare well, these are the minority. In the UK, almost half of the army’s youngest recruits, having left full-time education early to enlist, leave within four years. They then face a high risk of unemployment and long-term disadvantage. An official report in 2013 found that 30% of British infantry soldiers who left the army within four years were still not in work or education 18 months later. [Refer to chapter 8]

The army’s requirements for health and fitness, the camaraderie that many soldiers value, and the steady income, can help to buffer some of the impacts discussed here. Nonetheless, the health advantage that soldiers enjoy over civilians at the start of their career is lost in later life. Despite army trainees’ generally good health and fitness, veterans’ higher rates of drinking and smoking, common mental health problems, and physical injury, correspond with poorer general health in later life. [Refer to chapter 9]

Conclusion

In the process of transforming civilians into soldiers, army training and culture forcibly alter recruits’ attitudes under conditions of sustained stress, leading to harmful health effects even before they are sent to war. Among the consequences are elevated rates of mental health problems, heavy drinking, violent behaviour, and unemployment after discharge, as well as poorer general health in later life.

[1] (McGurk, Cotting, Britt, & Adler, 2006, pp. 22-23)

ARTICLE: ARMY AGGRAVATES PROBLEM BEHAVIOURS

PRESS RELEASE: VETERANS FOR PEACE UK

The risk of violent offending and heavy drinking rises after joining the army, according to a report released today.

Dan joined the army in 2006, at 18, having grown up in an area of high unemployment. He was told that military discipline would keep him out of trouble. After training he deployed to Iraq, and when he came home he assaulted a warrant officer. He was sentenced to 18 months in military prison.

‘The army’s training changed me,’ Dan said, ‘it made me more aggressive as a person. I shouldn’t have attacked that warrant officer, but I believe I wouldn’t have if that training hadn’t changed me in the first place. After the conviction the army wouldn’t support me, my mental health deteriorated and I was left feeling isolated and alone. I resorted to alcohol abuse and became homeless for a year, and I have suffered with chronic PTSD. I really believe that underlying all my problems was the effect of the training I was put through when I joined the army.’

‘I hear stories like Dan’s all the time,’ said Ben Griffin, a former SAS soldier and the National Coordinator of VFP UK. ‘The report we are publishing today confirms that army training increases violent behaviour and heavy drinking even before recruits are sent to war, contradicting the common assumption that joining the army reduces antisocial behaviour.’ He went on, ‘We want to increase the public understanding of the impact military service, so that people can make better informed decisions.’

The First Ambush? Effects of army training and employment (70pp) draws on veterans’ testimony and around 200 studies, mainly from the UK and US, to explore the effects of army employment on recruits, particularly during initial training.

The training process has a forceful impact on attitudes, health, and behaviour even before soldiers are sent to war. The findings show that military training and culture combine with pre-existing issues (such as a childhood history of anti-social behaviour) to increase the risk of violence and alcohol misuse (details below). Traumatic war experiences further exacerbate the problem.

Key data:

Research in the UK and US has found that:

Most military personnel and veterans are not habitually violent, but are more likely than civilians to behave violently in daily life.[1]

They are also twice as likely to drink heavily, which is a risk factor for violent behaviour.[2]

These problems are greater in the army than the navy or air force.[3]

Army training reinforces several risk factors for violent behaviour, including antagonism, aggression, hostility to other groups, and traditionally masculine norms.[4]

The prevalence of violent offending increases after joining the armed forces, and increases again after personnel return from war (reaching double the pre-enlistment rate, according to a British study).[5]

Pre-military factors, such as a background of anti-social behaviour, combine with military factors, such as being trained for combat and experiencing traumatic events in war, to drive up the risk of violent behaviour.[6]

Violence and heavy drinking by veterans are serious public health problems, says the report. A British study in 2012 found that 13% of British personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan admitted behaving violently in the weeks following their return.[7] Applied to all personnel deployed to Afghanistan alone over the course of the war, this proportion is equivalent to 17,500 individuals.

Other consequences of army employment include elevated rates of mental health problems and unemployment after discharge, as well as poorer general health in later life, according to the report.



Veterans For Peace UK, is a voluntary, open and democratic ex-services organisation of men and women. Together we have fought in every war that Britain has fought since WW2. As a result of our collective experience we say that “War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century”. Our fundamental purpose is to serve the cause of world peace.

Report author, David Gee, is a researcher with a critical interest in military recruitment practice, military employment, and the mental health of veterans. The report is a companion to The Last Ambush? Aspects of mental health in the British armed forces (2013).


[1] MacManus, D., Dean, K., Jones, M., et al. (2013). ‘Violent offending by UK military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: a data linkage cohort study’. The Lancet, 381, pp. 907–917; Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C. T. (2005). ‘Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen’. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862-876.
[2] Head, M., Goodwin, L., Debell, F., Greenberg, N., Wessely, S., & Fear, N. T. (2016). ‘Post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol misuse: comorbidity in UK military personnel’. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(8), pp. 1171-1180; Mattiko, M. J., Olstead, K. L., Brown, J. M., & Bray, R. M. (2011, June). ‘Alcohol use and negative consequences among active duty military personnel’. Addictive Behaviors, 36(6), pp. 608-614; McManus, S., Meltzer, H., Brugha, T., et al. (2009). ‘Adult psychiatric morbidity in England, 2007: Results of a household survey’. University of Leicester, The NHS Information Centre.
[3] MacManus, D., Dean, K., Jones, M., et al. (2013). ‘Violent offending by UK military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: a data linkage cohort study’. The Lancet, 381, pp. 907–917; Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C. T. (2005). ‘Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen’. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862-876.
[4] See The First Ambush report, pp. 41-42, for detail and sources.
[5] MacManus, D., Dean, K., Jones, M. et al. (2013). ‘Violent offending by UK military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: a data linkage cohort study’. The Lancet, 381, pp. 907–917; Bouffard, L. A. (2005). ‘The military as a bridging environment in criminal careers: The differential outcomes of the military experience’. Armed Forces & Society, 31(2), 273-296.
[6] MacManus, D., Dean, K., Iversen, A. C., et al. (2011). ‘Impact of pre-enlistment antisocial behaviour on behavioural outcomes among UK military personnel’. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(8), 1353-1358; Elbogen, E. B., Johnson, S., Wagner, R., et al. (2014). ‘Violent behaviour and post-traumatic stress disorder in US Iraq and Afghanistan veterans’. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204, 368-375; MacManus, D., Rona, R., et al. (2015). Aggressive and violent behavior among military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: Prevalence and link with deployment and combat exposure’. Epidemiologic Reviews, 37, 196-212
[7] MacManus, D., Dean, K., Al Bakir, M., et al. (2012). ‘Violent behaviour in UK military personnel returning home after deployment’. Psychological Medicine, 42, pp. 1663–1673.

THE COSTS OF WAR

Guy Lyons raising awareness of the true costs of war on Armed Forces Day in York.

EVENT: DEBATE AT THE IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM

WHERE ARE WE MARCHING?

Tuesday 11 July

Debate 6.30 – 8pm, exhibition open until 9.30pm

Imperial War Museum,  Lambeth Rd, SE1 6HZ

Click here for Tickets

A live debate, running alongside a major exhibition at IWM London, People Power: Fighting for Peace.

What is the future of protest in the UK and globally? Join comedian and political satirist Mark Thomas, Jim Waterson (Political Editor, Buzzfeed) and leading peace protesters including Kate Hudson (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) and former SAS soldier Ben Griffin (Veterans for Peace UK) as they discuss key issues, from the historical roots of protest to the role of social media in modern movements. This interactive debate will also explore current protest and peace movements to try to answer where the future of protest is marching.

The ticket price includes entry to People Power: Fighting for Peace, the UK’s first major exhibition to explore the evolution of the anti-war protest movement from the First World War to the present day. A unique combination of more than three hundred items takes visitors on a journey from the First World War to the present day, looking at how peace activists have influenced perceptions of war and conflict.

This event has been produced with the IWM Youth Advisers.

Suitable for: All ages

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/where-are-we-marching-the-future-of-protest-tickets-35233485303

REPORT: REMEMBER BRIAN HAW

REMEMBER BRIAN HAW, END THE WAR ON TERROR.

On the sixth anniversary of Brian Haw’s death members of VFP and other anti-war groups gathered in Parliament Square to honour Brian Haw and remember his courageous 10 year political protest opposite the Houses of Parliament against war. Photographs of his banners were on display and members of the public stopped to join in.

Facebook Pictures

Brian Haw

War on Terror

 

REPORT: VFP LEICESTER UP AND RUNNING

On Friday 16 June members of VFP from across the East Midlands gathered in Leicester.

They joined with the local anti-war group and held a two hour street action in the city centre involving chalking the pavement with anti-war messages and speaking with the public.

VFP will be meeting in Leicester on a monthly basis. If you are interested in getting involved then please get in touch with Chris Paling leicester@vfpuk.org

VFP PRESENTS: BLOODY MYTHS WITH JULIAN PUTKOWSKI

Flagwagging and Enthusiasm for War in 1914

On Monday 12 June 2017 at Housmans Books, Julian Putkowski advanced a challenging and alternative historical perspective of the ‘Rush to the Colours’.

The ‘Rush to the Colours’ during 1914, involved hundreds of thousands of men volunteering to fight for King and Empire. The statistics and images of recruits are represented as a staggeringly positive response to Lord Kitchener’s famous summons and an expression of contemporary public support for the government’s declaration of war against Germany. Viewed uncritically, the ‘Rush to the Colours’ is also represented as an historical precedent to legitimate the more general utility of overseas military adventurism.

Analysing the nature and pattern of recruitment, Julian maintained that the propaganda myth obscures and continues to divert attention from forces that lay behind the illusion of voluntarism. He argued that public commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the First World War has taken insufficient account of the economic and political coercion that contributed to unnecessary suffering and deaths of millions of people.

WHAT IS ARMED FORCES DAY?

In 2008 the Government published a response to the Report of Inquiry into National Recognition of our Armed Forces. In this document a series of recommendations were put forward to increase public engagement with the military in order to build a positive perception of the Armed Forces and by extension the wars they fight.

The 40 recommendations included; the wider use of uniforms in public, open days, an increased number of combined cadet forces in comprehensive schools and the creation of an Armed Forces Day.

Veterans Day had been launched in 2006 by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, he said the aim was to ensure that the contribution of veterans was never forgotten. It was decided to change the name to Armed Forces Day for 2009 and broaden the scope to raise awareness and appreciation for those on active duty.

The purpose of Armed Forces Day is to build a positive perception of the Armed Forces and by extension the wars they fight.

This year on Armed Forces Day VFP UK will be holding an event in York. We aim to give the public an honest insight into military life and war. Members of the public and members of VFP from around the country are encouraged to attend.

Information on our Armed Forces Day events 

Facebook Event

Download An Event Flyer


Veterans For Peace UK is an ex-services organisation of men and women. Collectively we have served in every conflict that Britain has fought in since WW2. We say; War is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century.


 

REPORT: STOP ENDLESS WAR

A contingent of antiwar protesters in the hundreds, gathered Tuesday for a rally, at 11 a.m., at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. They were led by the president of the Veterans For Peace, Barry Ladendorf. They demanded a “stop to the endless war,” and a start to a genuine “peace-building movement.”

A coalition of about ten other antiwar, peace and justice organizations joined with the Veterans For Peace in the spirited demonstration. Nine speakers participated in the two-hour program, along with music provided by Pat Scanlon, the Fugs and others.

The speakers raised their voices about the endless U.S. related conflicts around the globe in Afghanistan, Iraq and in Syria. They put emphasis on the war drums beating daily for a conflict with North Korea, and also, thanks to the hawkish Neocons and our influential Military-Industrial Complex, a possible U.S. war, starting in 2017, with Iran.

According to the authoritative “Cost of National Security,” the American taxpayers have been paying $8.36 million an hour, since 2001, to cover the expenses of our endless wars. After the demonstration at the Memorial, the protesters marched, around 2 p.m., to the White House to confront President Trump. There, they demanded a meeting – as soon as possible with him – to discuss his “military policy” and to re-direct government spending to issues closer to home. A letter that  Ladendorf had written to President Trump was read by one of his colleagues in front of the White House fence.

Speaking at the White House rally was Veterans for Peace activist, Bruce Gagnon. He’s also the coordinator of the “Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space.” He blasted the U.S./ NATO War Machine and referenced the White House as an often “black, dark, evil” house.

Baltimore Post Examiner

NAPALM SUNDAY: A MORAL INJURY

When 19-year-old Steve Bennett came home from Vietnam, he asked his mother if she still had his toy soldiers.

She told him they were in the attic in a container with his
old Lincoln Logs.

Long after Steve’s parents went to bed, he snuck up to the
attic and got the container.

He then went to the large backyard where he once played war
games as a kid with his neighborhood friends.

At the base of a weeping willow tree where he use to hide,
he poured lighter fluid on those plastic soldiers, and burned
them all to hell.

He instantly yelled, FUCK YOU!

Steve Bennett’s childhood officially came to an end.

Mike Hastie
Army Medic Vietnam

EVENT: ANNUAL GATHERING 2017

VETERANS FOR PEACE UK: ANNUAL GATHERING 10/12 NOVEMBER 2017
LONDON

This is our main gathering of the year and attracts VFP members from around the world. Please scroll down for dates, times, locations and accommodation options.
Please click here to register.



Friday 10 November

Revolting Mutineers: London’s  Rebellious History
A Guided Walk
 Fully Booked
2pm to 4pm
Farringdon Station, EC1

Band Night
7pm to 11pm
The Water Rats, 328 Gray’s Inn Rd, WC1X 8BZ


Saturday 11 November

Annual General Meeting
10am to 5pm
Friends House, 173 Euston Road, NW1 2BJ

Social Evening
7pm to 11pm
The Exmouth Arms, 1 Starcross Street, NW1 2HR

(Unfortunately the cinema night has been cancelled as the film
War School will still be in production and not ready for screening)


Sunday 12 November

Bag Drop
12 midday to 1230 pm
The Marquis, 51-52 Chandos Pl, WC2N 4HS

Remembrance Ceremony at The Cenotaph
1pm to 2pm
Whitehall Place, SW1A 2EU
https://vfpuk.org///2017/cenotaph-2017/

End Social
2pm to 5pm
The Marquis, 51-52 Chandos Pl, WC2N 4HS

PLEASE REGISTER: CLICK HERE 



DONATE

Please consider making a donation to VFPUK to help with the costs of our Annual Gathering:

Paypal

 

 

 



CALENDAR

 



MAP

Key locations are indicated on the map below, including accommodation suggestions.

 



ACCOMMODATION

Hostel at The Exmouth Arms
1 Starcross Street
London NW1 2HR

T: +44 (0)20 7387 5440
E: exmoutharms@publove.co.uk
Web: http://www.publove.co.uk/exmouth-arms-euston
Please mention you are VFP if you want to room with other VFP members.


Tavistock Hotel
48-55 Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9EU

T: +44 (0)207 278 7871
E: info@imperialhotels.co.uk
Web: https://www.imperialhotels.co.uk/en/tavistock

 



FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/events/1900120800211499/



PLEASE REGISTER: CLICK HERE 

ARTICLE: THE WAR ON TERROR BUSINESS AS USUAL.

Since the turn of the century, our society has prosecuted a long war across a number of countries. The public are aware of some elements of the war; other elements remain secret and concealed from view.

Air strikes, drone strikes, missile strikes, night raids, torture sites, internment camps, terrorist attacks, chemical attacks, sieges, invasions, and occupations are the tactics of this war.

If the aim of this war is to defeat terrorism, then it is an ongoing and spectacular failure, as the graph above illustrates.

If the aim of this war is to increase the status, power and wealth of individuals and institutions loyal to the War System, then it is an ongoing success story, and business as usual for our society.

The politicians get a place in history. The generals are promoted. The soldiers get medals. The arms dealers get sales. The bankers get profits. The corporations get access to resources and markets. The newspaper editors tell the story and the militarist on the street basks in the reflected glory of it all.

The death and destruction are external costs.

During this long war, opposing political factions have held power, each one has contributed to the perpetuation and expansion of the war, none have made a genuine effort to end the war. This “War on Terror” is just business as usual for a country dominated by the War System.

The mouthpieces of the War System muddy the waters:

• They vilify regimes for human rights abuses whilst feting others as important allies.

• They call for military action as the one-size-fits all solution to the complex problems we face in the 21st century.

• They respond to some attacks with screams of outrage whilst ignoring other attacks that would undermine claims to be better and more humane than others.

It does not have to be like this.

The War System relies on the daily participation of thousands and thousands of individuals to function. We can end this madness by refusing to participate at every level. It is time for us to abandon the War System.

END THE WAR ON TERROR,

ABANDON THE WAR SYSTEM!

 


Veterans For Peace UK is a voluntary ex-services organisation of men and women. Together we have served in every conflict the UK has fought in since WW2.

We say that war is not the solution to the problems we face in the 21st century and so through our words and actions we embolden ordinary people to abandon the War System.

The War System consists of all individuals and institutions that accept war and the preparation for war as a means to achieve status, power and wealth.

LEVELLERS DAY 2017

This short film was shot at Levellers Day in Burford on Saturday 20 May 2017.

Levellers Day commemorates three soldiers who were executed on Oliver Cromwell’s orders in Burford churchyard, Oxfordshire, 17 May 1649. They belonged to a movement popularly known as the Levellers, with beliefs in civil rights and religious tolerance.

During the Civil War, the Levellers fought on Parliament’s side, they had at first seen Cromwell as a liberator, but now saw him as a dictator. They were prepared to fight against him for their ideals and he was determined to crush them. Over 300 of them were captured by Cromwell’s troops and locked up in Burford church. Three were led out into the churchyard to be shot as ringleaders.

(Aly, Gerry, Ben, Dale, Chris.)

FREE ASSANGE NOW! PROTEST!

FREE ASSANGE NOW!

DATE: FRIDAY 19 MAY

TIME: 1400 ONWARDS

PLACE: DOWNING STREET

Following the release of Chelsea Manning on Wednesday the Swedish chief prosecutor Marianne Ny has today decided to discontinue the preliminary investigation concerning Wikileaks editor Julian Assange.

Now that this investigation has been dropped it is only correct that the British Government allow Julian Assange to leave the Embassy of Ecuador and travel freely to a destination of his choosing.

Over the last seven years Wikileaks have published; The Iraq War Logs, The Afghan War Diaries, Collateral Murder, Cablegate and numerous other government documents that have shed light on the true nature of the wars that we fight. As a result, Wikileaks editor Julian Assange has powerful enemies around the world, none more so than the government of the United States of America.

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) in London said after the news was announced that it remained obliged to arrest Mr Assange should he leave the Ecuadoran embassy on a lesser charge of failing to surrender to a court. This is beyond the pale.

Julian is a fearless anti-war publisher and he remains under threat of imprisonment. Now is the time to demand his safe passage from the Embassy of Ecuador in London to a destination of his choosing.

Come to Downing Street today and demand the release of Julian Assange.

FREE ASSANGE NOW!

Ben Griffin is a founding member of Veterans For Peace UK

LEVELLERS DAY: BURFORD 2017

Members of Veterans For Peace UK will be attending Levellers Day in Burford this Saturday. Keep an eye out for our flag.

https://www.facebook.com/events/1817127048541442/

Here is a report from last years event…

lev1
Myself (Gus Hales) and Paul Rogers of VFP Birmingham arrived amid early morning sunshine in the picturesque chocolate box Cotswold market village of Burford. The crowds hadn’t arrived yet, so there were no visible signs of the days events. We both headed into the parish church yard where the execution of the three Parliamentarian soldier Levellers took place some 260 years before.

lev2

We visited the memorial plaque to the three dissenters shot for standing up to the brutal tyranny of Oliver Cromwell, following the Parliamentary forces victory during the English Civil War. The crowds quickly gathered and we were soon listening to the Green Sea singers and their songs of protest. Banners and flags from every group imaginable concerning civil rights were on display. The Vicar gave his address and before we knew it the procession was off on its one mile route to the recreation ground for the days formal events. There were period costumes, Morris dancers, Musicians and Pike men, all in this good humoured and jovial pageant. The countless people who thanked us for coming was humbling to say the least.

lev3

At the showground a series of lectures took place in the site marque, whilst period folk music and dancing seemed to break out spontaneously. At the same time one of the festival organisers made a beeline for us, and informed us that she was made up that we were there and sincerely asked if we could run a stall at next years event. To my surprise I met some long lost friends from Birmingham, Oxford, Abingdon and Rugby. This was an amazing day, packed with fun, good humour and, light heartedness, but tempered with the importance and affirmation of just what the Levellers stood for. This was our first visit to Levellers day, but we both agreed that this would be the beginning of many visits and that we would definitely run a stall next year. To any VFP member or supporter reading this post, please stick this event in your diary, you will not regret it and you will not be disappointed, a great atmosphere a wonderful part of the country and I am assured that the weather is always sunny on Levellers Day. This was an amazing event in the spirit of what Veterans for Peace stands for, and we felt deeply connected to the historical but apposite stand that the 300 levellers stood for all those years ago. A truly humbling and enlightening experience.

Peace and happiness to all.

lev4

DISNEYLAND OF WAR

Director Chris Smiley and Producer Mike Hanes, an Iraq War combat veteran, challenge the glorification of war and violence in our culture while exposing the propaganda of the Miramar military air show.

This air show is one of many outlets where war and violence is given a warm, inviting, and exciting aura. The utter horror and brutality is not understood by so many. Promoting a positive image of war and violence to people, especially children, is extremely dangerous.

There is absolutely nothing cool, exciting, or heroic about ripping limbs, burning flesh, or shredding the organs of another human being. We need the public to understand the horrific nature of war and violence to be able to stand firm and vigorously question calls for war.

Mike Hanes served in Iraq with the USMC, he is a member of VFP San Diego.

BOMBERS MOON

Song: Bomber’s Moon by Mike Harding

The term “bomber’s moon” was used during the Second World War to indicate a night with a bright full moon, which enabled bomber aircrews to find and strike their targets. Conversely, it also allowed anti-aircraft guns to target bombers, or helped fighter planes to find and shoot them down. Both the German Luftwaffe and the British RAF took advantage of bomber’s moons and civilians in cities like Coventry, or Cologne, learnt to fear those especially bright nights that would probably bring air raids.

Mike Harding was born in 1944, a few weeks after his father was killed returning from a bombing raid over Germany. When, many years later, Harding released his’ song, Bomber’s Moon, he said it was:

“Dedicated to the memory of my father, Flight Sergeant Louis Arthur ‘Curly’ Harding, a navigator in Lancaster Bombers, who died with his crew when his plane was shot down returning from a raid over Germany. It’s also dedicated to the memory of my good friend Jurgen Boch of Cologne, who was a small child in a bomb shelter in Germany on the night my father died, and to my mother who was a bride, a widow and a mother within the space of a year.”

The War in the Air

During the Second World War, RAF Bomber Command sustained 50% casualties on strategic bombing missions over Germany. Over fifty-five-thousand aircrew met their deaths in combat and some crews were faced with the statistical odds of zero for surviving a tour of duty. After a varying number of missions, most crewmen experienced feelings of intense anxiety and depression. Some felt guilt about the civilians who had died below, many others had nightmares about going on bombing raids and several would ‘freeze’ while in the air. Richard Pape, in his book Boldness Be My Friend, explained how crewmen, like him, could experience a very real fear that the next mission would be their last:

“I strolled back to the mess, coldly, practical, unconcerned. And then it happened. As I walked through the deserted crew room my eye caught the enormous map of Europe on the wall. A terrible feeling of panic gripped me. I stood motionless, staring at the map, my eyes hypnotised by the coloured tapes that indicate the bombing routes. My heart pounded violently; I leaned against the wall gasping and breathless.

To try and pull myself together I began to swear – my infallible cure for nerves. As I steadied blind panic gave way to stark horror. Five words beat into my brain with maddening repetition: ‘You will not come back. You will not come back.’ I knew then I was doomed.”

In the early 50s Joseph Heller wrote Catch-22, a novel about an US air force unit led by a Colonel who kept raising the number of missions his men must fly before returning home, in order that the Pentagon would speed his promotion. In it the hero Yossarian approaches the doctor about a fellow pilot and asks:

‘Is Orr crazy?’

‘He sure is,’ Doc Danecka said.

‘Can you ground him?’

‘I sure can. But first he has to ask me. That’s part of the rule.’

‘Then why doesn’t he ask you to?’

‘Because he’s crazy,’ Doc Danecka said. ‘He has to be crazy to keep flying combat missions after the close calls he’s had. Sure I can ground Orr. But first he has to ask me to.’

‘That’s all he has to do to be grounded?’
‘That’s all. Let him ask me.’

‘And then you can ground him?’ Yossarian asked.

‘No. Then I can’t ground him.’

‘You mean there’s a catch?’

‘Sure there’s a catch,’ Doc Danecka replied. ‘Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat duty isn’t really crazy.’

There was only one catch, and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn’t, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn’t have to; but if he didn’t want to he was sane and had to.

Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.

‘That’s some catch, that Catch-22,’ he observed.

‘It’s the best there is,’ Doc Danecka agreed.”  

A Lack of Moral Fibre 

While Catch – 22 was fiction, Heller’s book was based on the underhand way the authorities dealt with men who had psychological problems, forcing them to continue combat duty. The reluctance of both the RAF and the American Army Air Force to deal humanely with this issue was not due to a lack of identification of these psychiatric disorders. In the combat situation facing them, both Air Chief Marshal Arthur Harris and General Henry Arnold, commander of the American Army Air Force, expressed a concern that if aircrew suffering combat fatigue were allowed to leave combat operations, it would open up the floodgates and thousands of crewmen would request to be taken off flying duties.           

Nicknamed ‘Bomber,’ Harris, who had been appointed Commander in Chief, Bomber Command, in February 1942, became extremely worried by the number of aircrew reporting ‘sick’ and asking to be taken off flying duties. He called such men ‘weaklings’ and ‘waverers’ and warned his commanders that such men should be dealt with harshly, because ‘the risk of contagion is very real.’

In 1988, Simon Berthon produced a documentary, Whispers in the Air, for Granada Television. Among former aircrew interviewed was a bomb aimer named Arthur Smith, who began to develop a growing fear of flying. His symptoms increased, until on one mission he found himself ‘frozen with fear’ and unable to carry out his duties. The aircraft returned to base with a ‘sick bomb aimer’ and he was immediately taken to hospital. When he was found to be physically fit, he was sent to a centre where a psychiatrist interviewed him. It was clearly spelt out to him that if he refused to fly, he would be dealt with harshly, along the lines recommended by Harris.

According to Jack Wallis, a former RAF Station Adjutant, this meant an immediate reduction in rank to Aircraftsman 2nd class, the lowest rank in the RAF. The ‘offender’ was then posted off station and his documents had ‘LMF’ (Lack of Moral Fibre) written in red ink, slanting across the right hand corner. Arthur Smith was informed that his family, girl friend, and his colleagues would be told that he was considered a coward. Smith was told that in 1914-18 he would have been charged with ‘desertion in the face of the enemy’ and shot. Rather than face the degradation, Smith chose to return to flying. The fears continued and a few missions later his aircraft crashed, some of the crew were killed but he survived, albeit with severe burns.

Another aircrew member interviewed was John Wainwright, a rear gunner. On his 72nd mission his aircraft crashed on landing, injuring him. After recovering in hospital he found he was unable to return to flying. Having completed 72 missions and been wounded in battle, he thought his removal from combat flying would be an easy process. He recalled, however, that the RAF doctors considered: ‘I was bonkers, completely bananas, because I didn’t want to go over Germany and drop bombs.’ Wainwright then went through an entire series of degradations because of his refusal to fly any more.

In 1944, the Secretary of State for Air, Sir Archibald Sinclair, wrote a private memorandum to Harris to say that if the way the RAF treated its combat fatigued members were made public, with the writing of LMF on their service records, then it would be ‘indefensible in Parliament.’ Harris had already ordered that his methods of dealing with cases of ‘LMF’ be classified as ‘top secret.’ For a time the documents were marked ‘W’ for ‘waverer’ before the insidious practice eventually ceased.

US Aircrews

In 1942, American heavy bombers entered the air war. They were ordered to undertake deep penetration daylight raids, which the RAF had given up a year before because of the high attrition rate. Within the next two years some 50,000 American aircrew were killed. The average number of missions before death was likely was computed to be only seven and a crew was expected to fly 25 missions on a single tour. By mid 1943, only one crew in three could expect to complete a tour.

In the autumn of 1943 rumours began to circulate about American bombers heading for neutral countries and in 1944 it was revealed that some were landing in Sweden and Switzerland. In Sweden most of the aircrews were interned in the village of Falcum and the American Consul in Goteborg, William Cochrane, who also helped located the site of the V1 and V2 experiments at Peenemünde, wrote a report about the aircrews who were flying to neutral countries. Some cases, where the aircraft was crippled, were genuine – but a lot were not. From his interviews with internees, Cochrane found that the option of landing in neutral countries, especially for crews feeling unable to continue flying combat missions, was being  discussed at British bases.

A bizarre footnote to this story came from Major Urban Drew, a fighter ace whose squadron flew long range Mustangs to escort the heavy bombers on their missions. Drew recalled a briefing in 1944, where Mustang pilots were asked to note the markings of any bomber which peeled off formation to head for Switzerland or Sweden. If the bomber seemed to be without battle damage, fighter pilots were to do their best to persuade the defecting crew to return to base. If all else failed, said Major Drew, ‘it was understood’ that the fighter pilots were to shoot down the defecting aircraft. Drew maintained that this was a clear verbal order and that at squadron level it was not written down because, had it appeared in writing, it would have been ‘unacceptable.’

For God’s Sake No More Bomber’s Moons

Richard Pape, who wrote Boldness Be My Friend, had continued flying until his plane was shot down over Holland. He was badly burned, but evaded the Germans for several months. After capture, he was interrogated by the Gestapo and detained as a prisoner of war. In 1995, Dan Van der Vat, who wrote Richard Pape’s obituary in the Guardian, told how Pape had experienced difficulty settling back into civilian life:

“… like many an-other forced by war to peak too soon, Pape found it hard to settle down to civilian life after his wartime adventures, which won him the Military Medal. He continued to get into trouble of his own making, involving violence or alcohol.

… He said he wrote his first book to exorcise the ‘demons’ that plagued him after the war. It appeared in 1953. In that year he was fined for firing shots outside the home of his estranged first wife. Boldness was turning into an enemy.

… The second of his 12 books described … [how] … he was also charged with drunken driving. He told the court he had been upset by a radio dramatisation of Boldness and was acquitted. Two years later he was acquitted again on a similar charge. His second wife left him in 1961, accusing him of physical cruelty. A ‘heroic’ drinker, Pape was given to chasing his literary agent round the office with a swordstick.

Another drunken driving charge in Papua New Guinea in 1965 was dismissed after evidence that Pape had hallucinated at the scene, thinking he was trapped in a burning plane and that the police were the Gestapo. He offered to drink a bottle of whisky in court to prove he could handle drink.”

The war in the air proved a decisive battle ground during the Second World War, with aircrews finding themselves in a front-line role in a conflict where more civilians than combatants were killed. Many of these non-combatant causalities were caused by mass bombings from aircraft, which culminated with the fire-bombing of Dresden in Germany and with the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan.

The justification given at the time was that these acts of city destruction and mass killing would hasten an end to the conflict. Many historians, however, now believe that our ‘Great Leaders’ were even then thinking of the next war, which would, they thought, probably be against our then ally Russia. And that the devastation of Dresden, Nagasaki and Hiroshima was a warning to the Soviets about what to expect if they ‘misbehaved.’

Since the end of the Second World War Britain’s armed forces have continually been active in conflicts in various parts of the world. In his song, Where have all the Flowers Gone, the late Peter Seeger asked: “When will we ever learn?” – and these words from the last verse of Mike Harding’s Bombers’ Moon is something we should all act on:

Now it’s ’84 in Bomber County

Mrs White dusts the picture and she cries:

Chalky White in uniform

Looking as he did the day he died.

And for God’s sake no more bomber’s moons,

No more young men going out to die too soon,

Old men sending young men out to die,

Young men dying for a politician’s lies.

For God’s sake no more bomber’s moons,

No more young men going out to die too soon,

Old men sending young men out to kill.

If we don’t stop them then they never will.

 This song was chosen by Aly Renwick, who served for 8 Years in the British Army in the 1960s, and is now a member of VFP.         

 

VFP LONDON: MAYDAY MARCH

Monday 1 May
1200
Clerkenwell Green, London, EC1R 0DU

This weeks VFP London street presence will be at the London May Day March.

Meet from 1200 at Clerkenwell Green under the VFP flag.

The march will leave Clerkenwell Green at 13.00 moving on to Clerkenwell Road / Theobalds Road / Red Lion Square / Kingsway / Aldwych / Strand

Rally in Trafalgar Square will start around 14.30.

Share our anti war message and recruit new members.

Wear VFP clothing.

Text Ben Griffin if you can’t find us.
07866559312

HEXHAM DEBATES 2017

logo-hd-l2017

HOW TO TURN YOUR CHILD INTO A KILLER

Saturday 6th May 2017 

11.00am – 12.30pm

St Mary’s Centre
Hexham
NE46 2EB

John Bourton & Daniel Lenham of VFP UK will be speaking at the Hexam Debates in 2017.

Veterans For Peace UK is a voluntary ex-services organisation of men and women, together they have served in every war the UK has fought since WW2. Through their work they aim to educate young people about the true nature of military service and war, to resist war and militarism through non-violent action and to stand in solidarity with people resisting militarism and war. Veterans for Peace hope to convince people that war is not the solution to the problems of the 21st century.

logo-hd-l2017